The Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) is the principal state institution responsible for combating corruption and bringing those involved in corrupt practices to justice in Bangladesh. As the country's primary anti-corruption agency, the ACC plays a crucial role in promoting transparency, accountability, and the rule of law. However, over the years, allegations of corruption, abuse of authority, harassment of innocent individuals, and manipulation of investigations against some ACC officials have raised concerns about the institution's credibility and effectiveness.
According to individuals involved in ACC cases and various publicly reported allegations, there have been claims that, in some instances, people have been implicated in cases despite insufficient evidence against them. It has also been alleged that certain dishonest individuals, acting through intermediaries or brokers, attempt to extort money by threatening to include names in investigation reports or charge sheets. While most of these allegations have not been proven in court, they have nevertheless contributed to growing public concern regarding the integrity of the investigation process.
Several alleged victims have claimed that they were subjected to unnecessary harassment, prolonged investigations, and psychological pressure through threats of being named in charge sheets. Many reportedly refrain from filing formal complaints because they fear that doing so could complicate ongoing investigations or expose them to further harassment. As a result, both accused individuals and those claiming innocence often remain silent out of fear.
At the same time, observers emphasize that it would be unfair to judge the entire institution based on the actions of a few individuals. The majority of ACC officials are widely regarded as carrying out their duties with honesty and professionalism. Nevertheless, misconduct by a small number of officials can significantly damage the reputation of the institution. Many compare the situation to the saying, "A single drop of impurity can spoil an entire bucket of milk." They hope that honest and competent officials within the ACC will strengthen internal accountability and ensure that innocent citizens are not subjected to unjust treatment.
One of the most widely discussed controversies involving the ACC concerned the investigation surrounding former police officer Mizanur Rahman. In that case, ACC Director Khandaker Enamul Bachir was accused of accepting a bribe of BDT 4 million (40 lakh). The allegations attracted nationwide attention and raised serious questions about public confidence in an institution responsible for fighting corruption.
The case also demonstrated the ACC's capacity to investigate allegations within its own ranks. Following the allegations, the Commission conducted an internal investigation, and disciplinary as well as legal action was taken against those involved. Ultimately, both Khandaker Enamul Bachir and former police officer Mizanur Rahman were subjected to legal and administrative proceedings. Analysts argue that this case illustrates that, despite allegations of internal misconduct, the ACC possesses mechanisms to investigate and address wrongdoing by its own officials.
Another widely discussed case involved former ACC official Sharif Uddin. He gained public attention for investigating several major corruption cases, including the illegal issuance of National Identity Cards to Rohingya refugees. After he was dismissed from service, Sharif Uddin alleged that he had become the target of retaliation for filing charge sheets against influential individuals and senior government officials.
The ACC, however, rejected these allegations, stating that Sharif Uddin had been dismissed because of multiple administrative and disciplinary violations. The conflicting accounts presented by both parties have generated considerable public debate and raised questions about transparency and fairness within the institution.
Former Cabinet Secretary Ali Imam Majumder has also expressed concerns regarding the ACC's internal accountability. In an interview, he remarked, "If this is the situation within the ACC itself, how can it effectively perform its duties? How can people place their trust in it? The problem lies within the institution." He further argued that the ACC must strengthen its internal reform efforts and implement meaningful institutional changes to restore public confidence.
Similarly, former Member of Parliament and lawyer Barrister Mahbub Uddin Khokon criticized alleged corruption involving certain ACC officials. Speaking in Parliament, he expressed concern over allegations against some members of the Commission and called for greater transparency and accountability within the organization. According to him, allegations of corruption against officials entrusted with combating corruption seriously undermine public trust and institutional credibility.
In addition, several former individuals involved in ACC investigations, speaking on condition of anonymity, alleged that some investigators harassed innocent people during the course of investigations. They claimed that certain officials attempted to extort money by exploiting fears of legal complications or inclusion in charge sheets. According to these individuals, some suffered significant financial losses. However, because of fear, social stigma, and concerns that legal proceedings could become even more complicated, many alleged victims have chosen not to speak publicly. The accuracy of these allegations can only be established through impartial investigations by the relevant authorities.
Experts argue that an effective fight against corruption requires not only taking action against corrupt individuals outside public institutions but also ensuring strict accountability within investigative agencies themselves. Greater transparency, impartiality, and adherence to due process during investigations would help protect innocent individuals from harassment while ensuring that actual offenders are brought to justice.
A strong, independent, transparent, and accountable Anti-Corruption Commission remains essential for promoting good governance in Bangladesh. Therefore, independent investigations into allegations against ACC officials, appropriate legal action against those found responsible for misconduct, and protection for honest officials are crucial. At the same time, it is equally important to safeguard the legal rights of individuals accused of corruption while ensuring that innocent citizens are not unfairly harassed.
Observers believe that by addressing its internal weaknesses and strengthening institutional transparency, impartiality, and accountability, the ACC can enhance public confidence in its anti-corruption efforts. Such reforms would not only improve the effectiveness of the Commission but also help ensure that innocent people are protected while the rule of law is upheld.