Before the fall of Sheikh Hasina’s government through the mass uprising, Bangladesh witnessed an unprecedented level of political unity. Even after the collapse, the atmosphere of solidarity remained strong. But as weeks have passed, cracks have begun to appear in that relationship. Instead of the expected unity ahead of elections, divisions are becoming increasingly visible. Former allies now doubt each other’s intentions, raising questions not only about political cohesion but also about the uncertain trajectory of the nation’s politics.The situation has drawn particular attention after Jamaat-e-Islami and Islami Andolon Bangladesh jointly announced protest programs. Their decision has sparked debates about whether such movements could destabilize the political climate or disrupt the electoral process. The government has expressed concern, with some critics alleging this may be a tactic to delay elections. Meanwhile, BNP leaders have voiced frustration, warning that unilateral programs by other opposition groups could deepen rifts and create instability.
Rifts Amid Consensus Talks
The divisions have emerged even as discussions continue within the Consensus Commission, formed to resolve the political crisis. Jamaat-e-Islami and Islami Andolon Bangladesh have demanded electoral reforms introducing a system of proportional representation (PR). On the other hand, BNP has consistently opposed this model, warning it could create further disorder.
BNP has declared its firm rejection of the PR system, while Jamaat argues that genuine democratic representation is impossible without it. “The people want fair representation,” Jamaat leaders say, adding that the existing system cannot ensure this. Islami Andolon has echoed the same stance, insisting that politics cannot remain a mere struggle for power and that reforms are essential to restore voting rights. BNP’s outright opposition has further amplified the discord within the opposition bloc.
NCP and AB Party Distance Themselves
At the same time, the National Citizens’ Party (NCP) and the Amar Bangladesh (AB) Party have distanced themselves from the joint movement. NCP leaders argue that restoring democracy requires more than slogans — it demands realistic strategies. Until minimum trust and a common roadmap are established, both parties say they will refrain from participating in joint programs.
Suspicion and Uncertainty in Opposition Politics
BNP leaders allege that unilateral initiatives during ongoing talks undermine the credibility of the movement. “Those who speak of unity are simultaneously announcing separate programs, which sends a wrong message to the people,” they argue.
Conversely, Jamaat and Islami Andolon leaders accuse BNP of clinging to outdated political structures and blocking necessary reforms. BNP Standing Committee member Amir Khosru Mahmud Chowdhury sharply criticized the move, saying:
“By announcing protest programs, Jamaat has shown disrespect to the Consensus Commission’s discussions and to the electoral process. People are waiting to vote — those who attempt to sabotage elections will lose public trust. For the sake of democracy, elections in February are non-negotiable.”
He further added:
“Most issues have already reached consensus. At a time when dialogue is ongoing, calling for agitation only undermines the discussion table and raises doubts among citizens.”
BNP Secretary General Mirza Fakhrul Islam Alamgir, upon returning from Singapore, also reacted angrily to the protest calls. “This was unnecessary. The talks were still underway, yet such a move only creates undue pressure, which is neither good for democracy nor for decision-making,” he said.
Warnings from Veteran Leaders
Former president of the Communist Party of Bangladesh (CPB), Mujahidul Islam Selim, cautioned that renewed divisions would only serve authoritarian interests. “The uprising was driven by the spirit of ending dictatorship. If political forces now slip back into infighting, the question remains — who will benefit? Every issue should be resolved at the discussion table,” he warned.
Conclusion
The early signs of disunity among opposition parties have raised concerns about the stability of Bangladesh’s political future. Analysts believe that unless parties act swiftly to restore trust and consensus, the path ahead may only deepen uncertainty.